Looking good, the rear thrust bearing should be a nice TIGHT fit in the case or the bearing will start to move after the rebuild (My first mistake).
opl505e wrote:
It certainly was - it brought the crank up with the case half when I lifted it off!
Today was inspection day to assess the general condition of the engine.
I was not disappointed!
Firstly, I dumped the pistons and cylinders in a bucket of jet fuel to gauge its performance – it’s not a boiling vat of acetone that’s for sure, but it does soften the crud so that a tooth brush removes all but the stubborn carbon deposits on the piston crown. I’ll leave them overnight and check tomorrow what affect it has. I can see plenty of brake cleaner still being used though.
We’ll start with the dullest picture first…

Just before I removed the rods, I checked the rod side clearance at between 0.25mm and 0.30 from rod to rod which is well within the tolerances of new parts and a sign of things to come…
I removed the rods and made a note of what bearing came off which rod, identifying them by the stamped rod number, and also what rod came from which journal etc.
In work, my business cards come in little clear plastic boxes, I always new they’d come in handy one day so collected a load of them from my colleagues to use as component trays.


Here, I noted which wrist pin came from which piston and in what orientation along with the retaining clips. Sad, I know…


The crank laid almost naked for the first time in 53 years.


I was now able to use my (Dads) digital vernier to check various bearing and journal sizes.
No1 main journal and bearing…


This gives a clearance of 0.08mm. The Bentley manual says the tolerance gap for new parts is 0.047mm to 0.102mm with a maximum wear limit of 0.19mm which means I’m bang in the middle of what new parts should be. What a result! I did check all the journals and bearing for ovality too and everything was as near as perfect as you could ask for.
Same for the No 4 journal and bearing….


A clearance of 0.08mm against new part figures of 0.031 to 0.83mm with a maximum wear limit of 0.17mm so again, within the tolerance of new parts.
I measured the remaining main bearing journals and they are exactly the same and without any evidence of scoring excessive wear or other damage.


I then inspected the condition of the big end bearings and rods internals and was again, pleasantly surprised at how little wear is evident.


Please forgive me but…. My crank ROCKS !!!

Sorry, couldn’t resist.
At this point, I’m over the moon with what I’ve found internally. The car has only 36,000 miles on it with evidence of frequent oil changes and this certainly shows to be the case judging by how fresh everything is.
I have decided that due to the low mileage and total originality of the motor, and on how little use it will get when on the road, on this occasion, I’m going to reassemble it will all the original components, albeit, checked and thoroughly cleaned. I had a similar look at the cam, which is spot on, even the piston ring gaps are like new. I’ll check and double check again of course, but other than the valves etc, this is one lovely motor and I see no reason to throw parts at it when the ones it currently has are within new part tolerances.
The next few days are going to be spent cleaning, cleaning and more cleaning…. Joy.
I can supply...
25/36hp Crank-Flywheel shims - 3 sizes
NOS king pin thrust & fibre washers - all sizes
Cloth braided nitrile fuel hose safe for modern fuels
PM me for details...